Android is a fun platform, as a user and as a developer. It's great that I can run non-market apps on my phone without jailbreaking/rooting it. It's great as a developer that I can browse the code to android.jar when implementing my code that runs on top of it. It's nice that Android gives you more control over your own device than the iPhone, but I wish they'd learn a few things from the iPhone too -- allowing apps to run in the background seems like a good idea at first glance, but the hardware is not really there yet and background services get in the way of the foreground app for me too often. Sometimes it really is nice though -- I wish I could install an app but then not let it run in the background, or only sometimes let it run in the background. I know that the multitouch UI is likely inhibited by restrictive Apple patents (which IMHO do a disservice to the entire smartphone industry) but my Android phone suffers for lack of it.
My observations are that Google's interests are not quite as aligned with indie developers as Apple's. Google is a search and advertising company first, a web app company second, and everything else third. Apple is a hardware company first, a client software company second, and everything else third. Thus, having an ecosystem of developers selling software for the platform is closer to Apple's heart than Google's. (Google would rather get the phones out there so people can perform searches and use webapps.) But, this said, Google is making good progress with the Android Market and the phones are really starting to take off. So the platform is still very promising.
But enough of that, on to the apps! We have two apps for Android: Baby Timer and the Contraction Timer.